“To be feared is much safer than to be loved” is one of the most outrageous statements in The Prince, and that is probably why it is also one of the most famous. The idea that it is better to be feared than loved is repeated throughout the work, and is a central argument of the piece. Machiavelli argues that the reason it is better to be feared is because love involves a “link of obligation,” which because men are fickle, they are willing to break when it is to their advantage. Fear of punishment, however, is something that men cannot escape and will thus be more loyal to.
I think that in a lot of ways Machiavelli is right. If you take “love” to mean that the prince is well liked or popular, then fear of punishment is much more motivating. It’s easy to see how easily the mob can turn against a popular politician when they have no fear of punishment. For example, in our country where we are not necessarily in fear of our president, take a look at how quickly most president’s approval ratings plunge:
| Image source: gallup.com |
That being said, I do think that if a leader is truly loved, not just liked, then love is a much more powerful motivator than fear. Fear may be safer for most leaders, but it can easily turn to the hate that Machiavelli warns against. Moreover, if a people truly love a leader they are more willing to give more of themselves and will not be trying to “get away” with whatever they can despite fear of punishment.

